'Not From Here,' stories by Nathan Deuel

A word of caution: Finding truth in Haiti disaster news


Survivors at a clinic in Port au Prince, January 12. (Image by Getty Images via Daylife)

New York Times media genius David Carr wrote an excellent column in the wake of Hurricane Katrina that should be reread today. In the dizzying swirl of terrible rumor that posed as news that late summer and fall, Carr took a hard look at news creators such as Tucker Carlson and Greta Van Sustern, who had repeated unsubstantiated but compelling reports of rape, murder, and widespread looting — none of which was ultimately proven to have  occurred, at least on the lurid scale so bitingly promised.

The column begins:

DISASTER has a way of bringing out the best and the worst instincts in the news media. It is a grand thing that during the most terrible days of Hurricane Katrina, many reporters found their gag reflex and stopped swallowing pat excuses from public officials. But the media's willingness to report thinly attributed rumors may also have contributed to a kind of cultural wreckage that will not clean up easily.

via More Horrible Than Truth: News Reports – New York Times.

Carr adds his own perspective from the day the Twin Towers fall. Victims still covered from ash told him that they’d seen men fighting on ledges, women tossing babies out windows, and other ultimately unsubstantiated stories. In the relative calm of the next few days, the real story began to emerge: People trapped were far too high to be seen in any detail. The ultimate record of 9/11 was no less horrifying, but far more true.

Haiti is undeniably suffering mightily now. And there are powerful stories being written that will indeed go down as the first draft of history. But before people begin to draw broad conclusions, beware the perils of reporting on the first days of disaster. Read, watch, and donate — by all means — but history and reporters like Carr remind us to reserve final judgment. Victims deserve both immediate attention and then, when time permits, a more thoughtful referendum, and hopefully one that helps prevent future disaster.

(Admittedly: It can also be hard to cover a disaster even decades later. When I worked in Cambodia, a famous anecdote for cub reporters was the tale of a breathless journo, still wet from the jungle, hollering about his hot scoop. “They slit their throats with palm fronds!” he yelled as he banged out his copy. The details didn’t turned out to be true. Often the best stories — and the most horrifying details — don’t necessarily check out. History is a marathon, news is a sprint.)

Follow me on Twitter.


Filed under: Haiti, Media, New York Times, World, , , , ,

One Response

  1. kaneo says:

    Great article. It is so easy to get caught up in the disaster hysteria, especially when the media plays and replays the same footage repeatedly. Of course our hearts go out to these folks but does anyone ever stop to think about de-sensitivity? In time, the plight of those stricken might possibly fade out, just like the crooked picture on the wall no longer bothers our sensibilities…stick to the facts (so we can donate to help)but let the people suffer this tragic event in private. Except it was inspiring to see the spirituality of the Haitian people.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s



%d bloggers like this: